The other day I bought some Bob Dylan.
I've a hunch about buying the greats. Unless you're going to buy Bob's entire back-catalogue, you have to decide whether to buy a couple of albums, or a compilation. Some say that the compilations never have the best tracks. I think that's rubbish in the case of Dylan, at least. His compilations don't lack his best songs, they just don't include
all of them. A tall order for a single compilation, I'd suggest. I think rather, the choice between compilation and album is the difference between (primarily) knowing about his place in music, and knowing the man.
If you buy a compilation, of course you'll be better positioned to 'get' the overall contribution of the artist to their time and have a sense of how they matured and changed over the years (if you pay attention to release dates and history, that is). A worthy enterprise.
But if you buy a couple of albums, I think you get to know the person, more
personally. You sit with them for a time. You'll never get all Bob's best songs this way; he has too many. And you won't get the sense of the whole. But there's something nice about sitting with the man for the year 1965, or whenever.
I bought albums.
On
Con's recommendation, I also bought
James Muller's Kaboom.